Monday 5 December 2016

Marxism & Pluralism Essay

The development of new/digital media means the audience is more powerful in terms of consumption and production. Discuss the arguments for and against this view.

In this essay I will be discussing the way in with the development of new digital media has changed the power that the audience has but also the consumption and production of information that audiences consume.


A Marxist perspective would argue that the so-called “information revolution” has done little to benefit audiences or to subvert the established power structures in society. Far from being a “great leveller” (Krotoski, 2012) as many have claimed, it has merely helped to reinforce the status quo by promoting dominant ideologies. The most popular news website in the UK by a considerable margin is the ‘Mail Online’, which receives more than 8 million hits every month and is continuing to expand rapidly – with forecasts that it will make £100 million or more in digital revenues in the next three years. Similar to its tabloid print edition, the website takes a Conservative, right-wing perspective on key issues around gender, sexuality and race and audiences appear to passively accept what the Marxist theorist, Gramsci, called a hegemonic view. When one of their chief columnists, Jan Moir, wrote a homophobic article about the death of Stephen Gately in 2009 there were Twitter and Facebook protests but, ultimately, they did not change the editorial direction of the gatekeepers controlling the newspaper.

On the other hand a pluralist would claim that new and digital media such as e-media is a powerful tool for those who want set up business in their homes. The vice president under Clinton, Al Gore has stated "The internet is an empowering tool... an exciting and revolutionary prospect." This is evident as the internet allows people to start posting their own news online citizen journalism; this is another example of how the audience has gained more control over the years because there is nothing to restrict them from posting online. Citizen journalism allows people to post news online which can be accessed from all around the world on social media websites and even news programmes like BBC news, channel 4 ect. use citizen journalism as well for their news stories. This illustrates how advances in technology have affected traditional media as they incorporate online sources on their news bulletins. One of the first cases of this was Rodney King who was a black man which was beaten up by the police and recorded by a man which gave the video to local news stations to be aired.

Marxists would say that the institutions still have most of the power. Due to the rise of new and digital media audiences have now been able to consume their news on many different social outlets in particular free online papers. The institutions have to think about how they are going to make money whether that’s on advertising or introducing a pay wall. As print media is in terminal decline institutions need to bring a pay wall so that the journalists don't lose their jobs and news becomes unreliable. James Murdoch quotes "It is essential for the future of independent digital journalism digital journalism that a fair price can be charged for news to people who value it". The journalists are losing their jobs because people aren't paying for news anymore they're going online and getting news for free. This changes the accuracy of the news that people are receiving because it can be bias due to one person sharing their view whereas the BBC has to be impartial. 



Pluralists believe that people in society are now gaining more power because of their power that new technology has given them such as being on social media websites; this gives people more access to more information which gives the consumers more control. This is evident when Negroponte (1997) says "the monolithic empires of mass media are dissolving into an array of cottage industries." People are communicating more online now and having an increase in power.

From this essay I can conclude that I believe that people are indeed in power more now because of the advances in technology have meant that they have more freedom and can do exactly what institutions do. This is evident due to the advances and introduction user generated sites such as YouTube and blogs.

No comments:

Post a Comment