Tuesday, 1 November 2016

Clay Shirky on news: don’t build a paywall around a public good



1)Why does Clay Shirky argue that 'accountability journalism' is so important and what example does he give of this?

Clay Shirky believes ‘accountability journalism’ it is essential as he believes stories to enables massive stories to be published. An example of this is of the Catholic Church scandal.

2)What does Shirky say about the relationship between newspapers and advertisers? Which websites does he mention as having replaced major revenue-generators for newspapers (e.g. jobs, personal ads etc.)?

 Shirky as believes that advertising and marketing has a massive role in the success of newspapers as it could determine whether or not they are making good revenue. This is beneficial as it would help newspapers to pay their journalists.

3)Shirky talks about the 'unbundling of content'. This means people are reading newspapers in a different way. How does he suggest audiences are consuming news stories in the digital age?


He illustrates that the future it will become digital because people are so use to the way that the news is just handed to them for free that now it seems weird to pay for something which is supposed to be a public good. 

4)Shirky also talks about the power of shareable media. How does he suggest the child abuse scandal with the Catholic Church may have been different if the internet had been widespread in 1992?


Shirky says that the Catholic Church scandal of 1992 died down at the end as the story got old. He believes that if the scandal occurred in the era where there was social media and internet the story would have been much worse.

5)Why does Shirky argue against pay walls?


Shirky believes that it isn’t a good idea he feels that the public shouldn’t be used for them to create money.


6)What is a 'social good'? In what way is journalism a 'social good'?


‘Social good’ is when people share the content.  This has a relation with journalists as the internet makes everything easily accessible which makes it easier for people to come together and share the story. This makes it a social good as it’s for everyone to share and see rather than only certain individuals.

7)Shirky says newspapers are in terminal decline. How does he suggest we can replace the important role in society newspapers play? What is the short-term danger to this solution that he describes?


There is no denying that newspapers are indeed declining rapidly and even though this is the case they are not replaceable as the news which is 
received is published by journalists so the news is regulated whereas news online is just given out without being regulated but it is down to the consumers to keep alive the newspaper industry.

8)Look at the first question and answer regarding institutional power. Give us your own opinion: how important is it that major media brands such as the New York Times or the Guardian continue to stay in business and provide news?


I believe that massive papers such as ‘The Guardian’ and ‘The New York Times’ is very powerful and influential in this generation. They provide a wider range of issues. This is the case as a short video cannot give us the full insight into the struggles of Britain leaving the EU

Monday, 31 October 2016

NDM Story Index-

NDM Story Index

Week 1: Story 2- 'Why Facebook is public enemy number one for newspapers, and journalism'

The decline in newspapers: MM case studies

The New Day


1) What was the New Day trying to achieve?
The new day article was introduced in order to aid the decline of print media such as newspaper due to the raise of new and digital media. It was also designed to target a new audience.

2) List the key statistics on the first page: how many people buy newspapers in the UK? How has this declined in the last year?
  • ·         6million people buy a newspaper everyday
  • ·         Over a million people have stopped buying newspapers in the last two years


3) What audience was the New Day trying to attract?
The newspaper was introduced to target and attract both male and females from ages 35-55.

4) Why do you think the New Day failed so spectacularly? There are several possible reasons listed in the article but do develop your own opinion here as well.
There are many reasons why I believe that the new day newspaper has been a complete disaster as first of all the pricing of the paper increased to 50p. Print media is in terminal decline meaning it will eventually die out this is the case as people are now keeping tabs on the via social media and other online sites on their latest technology. The fact that they will be receiving their news for free is a bonus for audience as it is less of an inconvenience for them to pay for their news when they can get it for free.

The Guardian


1) List the key statistics on page 10: How many unique digital browsers used the Guardian website in June 2016? What are The Guardian's latest print sales figures? How does this compare to the Telegraph? In terms of finances, how much did the Guardian lose in 2015?
  • ·         The Guardian online is the third most read paper on the internet,
  • ·         2015 the Guardian lost £70 million this led to cutbacks of 20%
  • ·         The sales of newspapers have been in steady decline since the explosive growth of the internet in the 1990s


2) What has been The Guardian's strategy for reversing this decline?
The guardian newspapers have the strategy of reversing the decline of print by ensuring their target audience invest into their business. This is the case as there hasn’t been any setback in other countries which drives them to carry on.

3) What global event did The Guardian's digital coverage win awards for?
 The event has indeed received awards for the attacks that took place in Paris because it was a way for people to keep updated which helped them survive.

4) In your opinion, will the global website strategy be enough to save The Guardian?
I think that it does because print news is only released once a day and with it being accessible online it makes it easier for people to gain access to it and t

Week 7: Story 14- 'Social media can be a pretty ugly place if you're a woman in politics'


Image result for women politicians

Social media can be a pretty ugly place if you're a woman in politics

https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2016/oct/21/female-politicians-social-media-abuse-european-parliament

Social media can be a place for politicians to express their opinions however its also a place where they can receive backlash due to social medias interactivity.
  • New report about social media, based on a survey of more than 900 female parliamentarians from 107 different countries. All the MEPs agreed: social media can be an pretty ugly place if you’re a woman in politics.
  • 22.8% of national members of parliament are women, and there are still 38 countries in which more than 90% of MPs are men.
  • “I do think there’s a psychology about this that we’re not trained in but I’m learning by accident,” she says.

I believe that it showcases how powerful social media is as its one of the biggest hosts for people to share there thoughts and opinion. This is evident in sites such as Facebook and Twitter where people can voice their opinion can also be countered with harmful and hateful comments. 

Week 7: Story 13 - Stephen Hawking says artificial intelligence could be humanity's greatest disaster

Image result for greenford high school h block

Stephen Hawking says artificial intelligence could be humanity's greatest disaster

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/10/19/stephen-hawking-says-artificial-intelligence-could-be-humanitys/

Stephen Hawking has suggested that artificial intelligence would be the end of civilisation,

  • “It will bring great disruption to our economy, and in the future AI could develop a will of its own that is in conflict with ours,” he said.
  • Professor Hawking, a prominent critic of making unchecked advances in AI, said that the technology promised to bring great benefits, such as eradicating disease and poverty, but “will also bring dangers, like powerful autonomous weapons or new ways for the few to oppress the many”.
I believe that Stephen Hawking is overrating a bit as i think that we should have artificial intelligence but they should be restricted to a specific amount and the roles that they have in society because it can cause people to lose their jobs.

Week 6: Story 12 - Elon Musk says fully self-driving Tesla cars already being built

Tesla cars being built right now have the hardware to truly drive themselves, Elon Musk has said.

Elon Musk says fully self-driving Tesla cars already being built

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/20/elon-musk-says-fully-self-driving-tesla-cars-already-being-built

Tesla has started to advance in their technology and our usual view on cars which is fully self-driving Tesla cars.
  • The death in May of a Tesla driver using the company’s existing Autopilot system prompted an investigation by safety regulators.
  • Rival automakers have said they expect to be able to field autonomous driving capability by 2019 or 2021.
  • Musk said the software was being built in-house and would run on an Nvidia Titan chip.
I believe that by Tesla investing on these new innovation will attract a mass audience due to the fact that it will be convenient for them as they wouldn't have to drive themselves. However, i feel like the technology is risky as people could hack into the software which is harmful for everyone driving or even those who are walking as the car could be controlled by a hacker just to cause harm to people.

Week 6: Story 11 - 'Facebook bans 'offensive' Swedish breast cancer awareness video'

Image result for facebook breast cancer

 'Facebook bans 'offensive' Swedish breast cancer awareness video'
      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/20/facebook-bans-swedish-breast-cancer-awareness-video-for-being-offensive

Facebook have been slated by The Guardian for banning a video that focused on breast cancer awareness
  • Cancerfonden said, “We find it incomprehensible and strange how one can perceive medical information as offensive" 
  • Facebook took down the video believing that the video portrays images and themes that would be uncomfortable for a facebook audience 
This story showcases social networks such as Facebook utilise censorship in the wrong way. The breast cancer awareness charity is sending out useful information to women regarding this illness. however some of the images where seen to be 'incomprehensible and strange how one can perceive medical information as offensive" by Facebook